The Women Of Jane Austen :: Jane Austen Females Essays

The Women of Jane AustenJane Austen has attracted a great deal of critical attention in recent years. Many have mouth out about the strengths and weaknesses of her characters, particularly her heroines. Austen has been cast as both a friend and foe to the rights of women. According to Morrison, most feminist studies have represented Austen as a conscious or unconscious subversive voicing a womans frustration at the rigid and sexist social order which enforces subservience and dependence (337). Others feel that her conglutination plots are representative of her allegiance to the social quid pro quo of her time Marriage, almost inevitably the narrative event that constitutes a happy ending, represents in their linear perspective a submission to a masculine narrative imperative that has traditionally allotted women love and men the world (Newman 693). In reality, Austen cannot accurately be evaluated as an root (or feminist subversive) without first examining the eighteenth century English society in which she lived and placed her heroines. Watt says that Austens characters cannot be seen clearly until we make allowances for the social order in which they were rooted (41). Austen lived in a society where women were expected to be accomplished, as Darcy states in Pride and Prejudice, but not well educated (Notes). Women of the late eighteenth-century could not attend educational institutions like Oxford or Cambridge. It was not considered necessary for a woman to have knowledge of either Greek or Latin. If a woman received training, it was unremarkably religious or domestically practical. The expected accomplishments of a woman at the time included the ability to draw, singing, speaking modern languages (such as Italian or French), and playing a musical instrument, usually the piano. These accomplishments were required to attract the right (rich) kind of husband. A womans financial status was very important, and yet there was piddling she could do to improve it. Women of some social standing could not just go out and get a job. The only opportunities for support outside ones family was engagement as a governess, or live-in teacher. Money for a woman usually only came through marriage or the death of her father, and then only if she had no brothers or other male relatives.Marriage, then, was looked upon by both men and women as a necessity for security, regardless of a lack of attraction or love. long-range financial stability had to be procured at an early age.